My post was intended to be light hearted and accurate. The only reason I saw the code was that it was initially displayed in tpikdave's post. His subsequent profile editing removed it. The edited sig did not require a repost to be displayed in it's new form hence the lack of editing evidence in tpikdave's post.

At the time of both my posts I had actually misinterpreted what tpkdave was attempting (and succeeding) in doing. It did not occur to me to look at the source. If it had I would have most certainly would have indicated how to do so in my reply to Mitch.

I am sorry if anyone felt I was being offhand or brusque, but it certainly wasnt my intent,

:) :)