|
t_bare
I think it does matter. Why should you be the one to apologize? You were, and are, absolutely correct to take some offense at the shabby way you were treated in that other thread. Your statements there were right on the money, and you were sort of screwed over a little by someone who seemed to be taking advantage of his position as moderator.
If the "head honcho" (Alex) states a forum policy, why shouldn't other moderators also be required to adhere to it and promote it themselves? Or can they just make ad hoc policy on the spur of the moment, as it suits them? If they can contradict published policy, why have policy at all? Are rules really rules, or just guidlines and suggestions?
From an early November thread discussing help in downloading with Morpheus: http://www.pcnineoneone.com/cgi-bin/dcforum/dcboard.cgi?az=show_thread&om=26716&forum=computer
Reply #1 - Alex: "we do not discuss, encourage, support, condone, enable, or promote any form of piracy here in this forum, and that includes music."
Aren't the terms "discuss" or "encourage" or "enable" all pertinent and applicable to helping someone solve a problem with either installing or using Morpheus? Where is the difference?
Reply #5 - Alex: "but the other 99.9% of people who use morpheus and password cracking programs and the likes use it for illegal purposes, and therefore it will not be discussed here."
The word "discussed" appears to be pretty much all-inclusive. And "it will not be discussed here" doesn't leave much room for doubt or misinterpretation about what he meant. If Alex makes clear unequivocal statements like those, why does Grogan feel free to contradict or re-interpret them? If this policy change has been cleared with Alex, why doesn't Grogan say so?
From a mid-December thread discussing help installing Morpheus: http://www.pcnineoneone.com/dcforum/computer/29346.html
Reply #6 - Grogan: "Furthermore, it's a legitimate PC question, regarding the installation of a piece of software. Software that isn't even illegal. I'm reminding you that you are out of line, per your own request"
This seems to be really splitting hairs. Alex made no distinction between discussion about the installation versus the use of Morpheus and other similar programs. How many people would care that they couldn't install Morpheus, if they didn't already intend to use it? If you solve their installation problem, aren't you at least tacitly assuming and condoning their use of that program? How can someone possibly be out of line for pointing out and promoting Alex's own policies, which have already been previously established and published?
Reply #10 - Grogan: "That's all I need to see, it's not up to me or you to judge others. Where do you draw the line?"
Alex seems to have already made a judgment and drawn a line, so indeed why should it be up to Grogan? He then proceeds in Reply #7 to help solve the Morpheus installation problem, in direct conflict with Alex's stated policy.
Nobody should ever expect this place to be an absolute democracy. If the moderators disagree, they ought to discuss and settle it among themselves, and then at least present a united front in open posts.
If not, then maybe Alex could state that the most recent statement by any moderator automatically becomes the new version of forum policy. Or maybe moderators should be more explicit about whether their statements are just their own personal opinions.
In the end, the real questions seem to be:
Are all moderators equal, or are the others assistants to Alex, with limited scope and authority?
Are all moderators independent and free to give interpretations contrary to Alex's stated policies?
|